basic hockey rules

search for more blogs here

 

"Adapting NROL Workouts for In-Season Hockey Player - JP Fitness ..." posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-12-19 16:38:28

I've been off for the measure two weeks and will be off for the next two weeks until I start the Spring semester at the University. Since last June I have been playing in an adult recreational hockey unify and I've let my time in the weight room suffer because of it. In the Spring I'll be playing for the University and would desire to be in top form strength-wise when the season begins. And before you ask unfortunately there is no strength training staff the aggroup is a unify sport not a varsity sport. Positives about playing: I've lost about 20 pounds from all the aerobic exercise and I've got much more stamina than measure June. Negatives about playing: The loss of strength and a recurrence of some hip flexor hurt that always comes approve unless I'm relentless in the gym (I haven't been) with squats and deadlifts to strengthen my ankles knees and hip joints. So I've been back in the gym doing the Strength I workouts. Fantastic stuff. Very challenging and I am definitely regaining some of my lost strength. My concern is this: these workouts are going to murder me during the season. How can I adapt them to be less brutal to allow me to alter two practices (Tues/Thurs) and two full days of games (Sat/Sun) while comfort making progress in the gym? I'm not just talking about the Strength I workouts either. I intend on cycling through to keep muscular adaptation at bay. From what I've read about NHL training they take a good amount of time off and away from everything and then start lifting again in time for the season. Basic off season charge training has a warm-up to get the player reacquainted with the gym hypertrophy period to bulk maximal period to increase strength and finishes with a dynamic period to provide maximum explosive ability at the beginning of the toughen. Haven't read anything specific about the "in-season maintenance" routines because they're always just referred to as "in-season maintenance" routines. Thanks in advance.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://forums.jpfitness.com/new-rules-lifting-original/35966-adapting-nrol-workouts-season-hockey-player.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Bloggers Get Box Seats!" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-10-18 05:21:06

The New York Islanders “Blog Box” is officially open for business! Twelve bloggers have been selected. (with more to come) and the links and introductions are all posted on the official under “news” on the heading menu. Imagine that! If you look at their pictures they all look like normal enough folk. They all appear to be people who are capable of following rules and guidelines set forth by the team. (Well maybe all but a couple of them!) So why is something like this so unusual? Why are the Islanders the only NHL team to officially have a “Blog Box”? In my opinion there are a couple of reasons and we will take look at them in a bit. First of all while the Islanders might be the only NHL team to have an official press area designated for bloggers they are not the only NHL team to recognize some bloggers as a legitimate media source. The Washington Capitals have long been giving a number of bloggers press credentials and special team access. These bloggers sit in press row with the other members of the media and are invited to press conferences just like the professionals. Other teams like the and embrace fan bloggers and even provide links to the blogger sites from their official home pages. Then of course there are teams who treat their fan bloggers like the competition or the enemy. For instance not too long ago someone posted a message over at the official Hurricanes Message Boards that they had just found “Canes Country”. They mentioned what a wonderful site it was and that people should check it out sometime! Well that message was immediately deleted and the person who posted it was warned that it was against the rules to post links or information about other sites on that board. REALLY? What a shame that Caniacs are not allowed to find out about “Canes Country” and other fan sites directly from the Hurricanes. It does make one wonder if the Hurricanes franchise is a friend of the fan blogger or foe. Why don’t they embrace amateur bloggers like some of the other teams do? During the first week of July. I received an email from the Hurricanes director of Media Relations. Mike Sundheim asking me for some input regarding a couple of ideas. I happily responded with a few suggestions one of which was to link some fan sites from the Hurricanes main webpage like the previously mentioned teams do. I thought that would be a nice service to provide for fans in general and it would take minimal effort from the staff. Plus it would be a recognition of sorts for fan bloggers who have supported the team so fervently in the past. Well it’s 3 months later and I have yet to hear back from Mike so I have to assume that the things we discussed are either not going to happen or were put on the back-burner for now. I know that Mike is very busy and I’m not blaming him. All I’m doing is comparing the differences of how various NHL teams deal with fan bloggers. Some are certainly more responsive than others. The Islanders media guys must really be given kudos for all the extra time that they took in preparing the blogger box interviewing and selecting the different bloggers and for reading the numerous applications and sample blogs that were sent to them. It had to be extremely time consuming. So now we get to the crux of this post why aren’t more bloggers allowed in the press box? Why aren’t more given team access? Why aren’t more given some type of credentials? I have talked about this with a few people and I think it all comes down to one thing. Teams don’t want to upset the traditional media the print media. I don’t think it matters to the radio and television guys bloggers wouldn’t hurt their business. But let’s face it what’s the main difference between a professional blog like Lord Stanley’s Blog or John Forslund’s blog versus an amateur fan blog? The main difference that I see is that the professionals have inside access to information that the amateur blogs don’t have. If we examine the hockey blogs which are linked to and read from the most blogs run by James Mirtle. Paul Kukla. Off Wing Opinion. Japer’s Rink and others we see that these writers each have special media access. With this access they can provide information that the little guy just can’t offer until after it’s reported. Most of them built their blog empires because of hard work excellent writing and because of special inside access. I’m sure that seeing success like that scares the print media to death. Obtaining information from blogs is becoming mainstream now. People are reading blogs more every single day not only sports blogs but in every news and entertainment category. Is it a coincidence that when John Forslund starting blogging for WRAL the News and Observer blog started being updated several times per day? This after we saw weeks of inactivity all summer long? Sure it was offseason but we never saw this kind of blogging last season either. It’s turning into a competitive blog world out there! Sportswriters might tell you that they don’t want the pressbox to be open to general bloggers because the amateurs might whoop it up and cheer and act unprofessionally but I can’t believe that’s the real reason. Most consistent bloggers with popular blogs are intelligent mature people. Believe me the ones that I have met can be mature enough to be respectful and follow the basic rules in a pressbox. Besides if they don’t follow the rules they can always be escorted from the box never to return can’t they? Like it or not professional writers are eventually going to have to face the facts. Amateur blogging is here to stay. The writing is improving more people are reading and at some point more and more amateurs will be gaining access previously not granted before. The Islanders obviously didn’t care whether or not they offended their local press. They probably felt neglected by the coverage which was allotted to them compared to the other metro teams. Now they have created a buzz that the other teams don’t have plus have more people writing about them then ever before! Hopefully this will translate to a higher readership as well. It will be an interesting experiment to follow and other teams will be watching closely. Will this be the start of a trend or will the experiment burn up in flames? Either way. I’m sure that there are more than a few New York sportswriters out there that would love to put a lock on that blog box!

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.nhldigest.com/bloggers-get-box-seats/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Bloggers Get Box Seats!" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-10-18 05:21:05

The New York Islanders “Blog Box” is officially open for business! Twelve bloggers have been selected. (with more to come) and the links and introductions are all posted on the official under “news” on the heading menu. Imagine that! If you look at their pictures they all look like normal enough folk. They all appear to be people who are capable of following rules and guidelines set forth by the team. (Well maybe all but a couple of them!) So why is something like this so unusual? Why are the Islanders the only NHL team to officially have a “Blog Box”? In my opinion there are a couple of reasons and we will take look at them in a bit. First of all while the Islanders might be the only NHL team to have an official press area designated for bloggers they are not the only NHL team to recognize some bloggers as a legitimate media source. The Washington Capitals have long been giving a number of bloggers press credentials and special team access. These bloggers sit in press row with the other members of the media and are invited to press conferences just like the professionals. Other teams like the and embrace fan bloggers and even provide links to the blogger sites from their official home pages. Then of course there are teams who treat their fan bloggers like the competition or the enemy. For instance not too long ago someone posted a message over at the official Hurricanes Message Boards that they had just found “Canes Country”. They mentioned what a wonderful site it was and that people should check it out sometime! Well that message was immediately deleted and the person who posted it was warned that it was against the rules to post links or information about other sites on that board. REALLY? What a shame that Caniacs are not allowed to find out about “Canes Country” and other fan sites directly from the Hurricanes. It does make one wonder if the Hurricanes franchise is a friend of the fan blogger or foe. Why don’t they embrace amateur bloggers like some of the other teams do? During the first week of July. I received an email from the Hurricanes director of Media Relations. Mike Sundheim asking me for some input regarding a couple of ideas. I happily responded with a few suggestions one of which was to link some fan sites from the Hurricanes main webpage like the previously mentioned teams do. I thought that would be a nice service to provide for fans in general and it would take minimal effort from the staff. Plus it would be a recognition of sorts for fan bloggers who have supported the team so fervently in the past. Well it’s 3 months later and I have yet to hear back from Mike so I have to assume that the things we discussed are either not going to happen or were put on the back-burner for now. I know that Mike is very busy and I’m not blaming him. All I’m doing is comparing the differences of how various NHL teams deal with fan bloggers. Some are certainly more responsive than others. The Islanders media guys must really be given kudos for all the extra time that they took in preparing the blogger box interviewing and selecting the different bloggers and for reading the numerous applications and sample blogs that were sent to them. It had to be extremely time consuming. So now we get to the crux of this post why aren’t more bloggers allowed in the press box? Why aren’t more given team access? Why aren’t more given some type of credentials? I have talked about this with a few people and I think it all comes down to one thing. Teams don’t want to upset the traditional media the print media. I don’t think it matters to the radio and television guys bloggers wouldn’t hurt their business. But let’s face it what’s the main difference between a professional blog like Lord Stanley’s Blog or John Forslund’s blog versus an amateur fan blog? The main difference that I see is that the professionals have inside access to information that the amateur blogs don’t have. If we examine the hockey blogs which are linked to and read from the most blogs run by James Mirtle. Paul Kukla. Off Wing Opinion. Japer’s Rink and others we see that these writers each have special media access. With this access they can provide information that the little guy just can’t offer until after it’s reported. Most of them built their blog empires because of hard work excellent writing and because of special inside access. I’m sure that seeing success like that scares the print media to death. Obtaining information from blogs is becoming mainstream now. People are reading blogs more every single day not only sports blogs but in every news and entertainment category. Is it a coincidence that when John Forslund starting blogging for WRAL the News and Observer blog started being updated several times per day? This after we saw weeks of inactivity all summer long? Sure it was offseason but we never saw this kind of blogging last season either. It’s turning into a competitive blog world out there! Sportswriters might tell you that they don’t want the pressbox to be open to general bloggers because the amateurs might whoop it up and cheer and act unprofessionally but I can’t believe that’s the real reason. Most consistent bloggers with popular blogs are intelligent mature people. Believe me the ones that I have met can be mature enough to be respectful and follow the basic rules in a pressbox. Besides if they don’t follow the rules they can always be escorted from the box never to return can’t they? Like it or not professional writers are eventually going to have to face the facts. Amateur blogging is here to stay. The writing is improving more people are reading and at some point more and more amateurs will be gaining access previously not granted before. The Islanders obviously didn’t care whether or not they offended their local press. They probably felt neglected by the coverage which was allotted to them compared to the other metro teams. Now they have created a buzz that the other teams don’t have plus have more people writing about them then ever before! Hopefully this will translate to a higher readership as well. It will be an interesting experiment to follow and other teams will be watching closely. Will this be the start of a trend or will the experiment burn up in flames? Either way. I’m sure that there are more than a few New York sportswriters out there that would love to put a lock on that blog box!

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.nhldigest.com/bloggers-get-box-seats/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Bloggers Get Box Seats!" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-10-18 05:21:04

The New York Islanders “Blog Box” is officially open for business! Twelve bloggers have been selected. (with more to come) and the links and introductions are all posted on the official under “news” on the heading menu. Imagine that! If you look at their pictures they all look like normal enough folk. They all appear to be people who are capable of following rules and guidelines set forth by the team. (Well maybe all but a couple of them!) So why is something like this so unusual? Why are the Islanders the only NHL team to officially have a “Blog Box”? In my opinion there are a couple of reasons and we will take look at them in a bit. First of all while the Islanders might be the only NHL team to have an official press area designated for bloggers they are not the only NHL team to recognize some bloggers as a legitimate media source. The Washington Capitals have long been giving a number of bloggers press credentials and special team access. These bloggers sit in press row with the other members of the media and are invited to press conferences just like the professionals. Other teams like the and embrace fan bloggers and even provide links to the blogger sites from their official home pages. Then of course there are teams who treat their fan bloggers like the competition or the enemy. For instance not too long ago someone posted a message over at the official Hurricanes Message Boards that they had just found “Canes Country”. They mentioned what a wonderful site it was and that people should check it out sometime! Well that message was immediately deleted and the person who posted it was warned that it was against the rules to post links or information about other sites on that board. REALLY? What a shame that Caniacs are not allowed to find out about “Canes Country” and other fan sites directly from the Hurricanes. It does make one wonder if the Hurricanes franchise is a friend of the fan blogger or foe. Why don’t they embrace amateur bloggers like some of the other teams do? During the first week of July. I received an email from the Hurricanes director of Media Relations. Mike Sundheim asking me for some input regarding a couple of ideas. I happily responded with a few suggestions one of which was to link some fan sites from the Hurricanes main webpage like the previously mentioned teams do. I thought that would be a nice service to provide for fans in general and it would take minimal effort from the staff. Plus it would be a recognition of sorts for fan bloggers who have supported the team so fervently in the past. Well it’s 3 months later and I have yet to hear back from Mike so I have to assume that the things we discussed are either not going to happen or were put on the back-burner for now. I know that Mike is very busy and I’m not blaming him. All I’m doing is comparing the differences of how various NHL teams deal with fan bloggers. Some are certainly more responsive than others. The Islanders media guys must really be given kudos for all the extra time that they took in preparing the blogger box interviewing and selecting the different bloggers and for reading the numerous applications and sample blogs that were sent to them. It had to be extremely time consuming. So now we get to the crux of this post why aren’t more bloggers allowed in the press box? Why aren’t more given team access? Why aren’t more given some type of credentials? I have talked about this with a few people and I think it all comes down to one thing. Teams don’t want to upset the traditional media the print media. I don’t think it matters to the radio and television guys bloggers wouldn’t hurt their business. But let’s face it what’s the main difference between a professional blog like Lord Stanley’s Blog or John Forslund’s blog versus an amateur fan blog? The main difference that I see is that the professionals have inside access to information that the amateur blogs don’t have. If we examine the hockey blogs which are linked to and read from the most blogs run by James Mirtle. Paul Kukla. Off Wing Opinion. Japer’s Rink and others we see that these writers each have special media access. With this access they can provide information that the little guy just can’t offer until after it’s reported. Most of them built their blog empires because of hard work excellent writing and because of special inside access. I’m sure that seeing success like that scares the print media to death. Obtaining information from blogs is becoming mainstream now. People are reading blogs more every single day not only sports blogs but in every news and entertainment category. Is it a coincidence that when John Forslund starting blogging for WRAL the News and Observer blog started being updated several times per day? This after we saw weeks of inactivity all summer long? Sure it was offseason but we never saw this kind of blogging last season either. It’s turning into a competitive blog world out there! Sportswriters might tell you that they don’t want the pressbox to be open to general bloggers because the amateurs might whoop it up and cheer and act unprofessionally but I can’t believe that’s the real reason. Most consistent bloggers with popular blogs are intelligent mature people. Believe me the ones that I have met can be mature enough to be respectful and follow the basic rules in a pressbox. Besides if they don’t follow the rules they can always be escorted from the box never to return can’t they? Like it or not professional writers are eventually going to have to face the facts. Amateur blogging is here to stay. The writing is improving more people are reading and at some point more and more amateurs will be gaining access previously not granted before. The Islanders obviously didn’t care whether or not they offended their local press. They probably felt neglected by the coverage which was allotted to them compared to the other metro teams. Now they have created a buzz that the other teams don’t have plus have more people writing about them then ever before! Hopefully this will translate to a higher readership as well. It will be an interesting experiment to follow and other teams will be watching closely. Will this be the start of a trend or will the experiment burn up in flames? Either way. I’m sure that there are more than a few New York sportswriters out there that would love to put a lock on that blog box!

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.nhldigest.com/bloggers-get-box-seats/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"War of the Clans" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-04-08 03:54:18

or family accommodate is for the entire clan a sacrosanct place the displace where disputes are settled festivals celebrated and generations lived. If two words could say what Kodavas do beat it would be 'defence forces' and 'hockey'. Over the years though both the be of youth joining the defence forces and those taking to hockey have diminished aggravated by the prospect of greener pastures. IT salaries and a more urbanised manner of life. It was a hunger for the 'good old days' the passion for the game and the practicality of keeping the clans together for basic survival that led to the conception of the annual Kodava family hockey tournament ten years ago by Pandanda Kuttanni. The eleventh such tournament an event that sees thousands of Kodava players and spectators participating is currently underway in a little village called Kakotuparambu in interior Kodagu. The tournament is organised by one family every year. This year a relatively small family of about 180 members called Mandetira has taken rush. I arise up to an elevated area reserved for the media the commentator and am instantly welcomed by the members of the family in true Kodava style. The men all wearing color shirts with their family names on them enthusiastically inform the event to me. It is only when I express them that I am a native of Kodagu myself and experience about the event that they call drink a bit. Sunil Mandappa a member of the Mandetira family explains that there are 186 families that are playing this year. Three years ago. 280 families participated and this record found a mention in the Limca schedule of Records. The Kodava Cup is said to be the only one of its kind in the world that is organised by clans at such a large measure. Each team that plays can undergo players in the age group of 8-65 years although there have been younger and older players in the previous years. A aggroup can have men playing with little boys girls and married women too. Married women or can compete for both the husband's family and the paternal clan. The entire expenses of the tournament is borne by the organising clan though sponsors fling in too. Government aid is small the utter lack of political presence welcome. Months before the summer event stadiums are built fasten cleared and players are trained by the Field Marshall Cariappa Trust. Another member of the family. Suresh says that the idea was to get all the families together and keep them united. A great deal of match-making also happens he admits with a slight smile. The event helps to promote hockey too he says though adding almost as an after thought that he is a play player. As we sit watching a match between the royal Apparanda family and Armanamada family. Suresh says that summer is the best measure for the event after the coffee blossoms and during school vacations. Looking approve he says that the event has seen several Olympians national level players amateurs little boys and septuagenarians playing. Several have gone on to play professional hockey too their hockey skills landing them in jobs elsewhere. The stadium with a seating capacity of 17,000 plus is sparsely occupied. The exciting matches are yet to mouth. Meanwhile for the families it is a festive measure. Many be outside the district many in bungalows buried deep within the folds of coffee estates many in villages with thatched huts and a little government primary school where students do not often see cars. This is one time of the year when they meet gossip party and beat bonds. Hockey seems just a very good excuse. As they sip coffee sample the pork and talk of the defy the commentator announces that the Armanamada family has won the be. The players shake each others' hands there is polite applause. In the backdrop the

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://dbhasthi.blogspot.com/2007/10/war-of-clans.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Umpirical Infallibility" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-01-18 00:13:31

The baseball season is over. The Rangers’ record? 75-87. Disappointing but not surprising. I would say. Better than one would have expected earlier in the season at least. We were 23-42 on June 13. We actually had a winning preserve since that point in the season. But going 19 games below.500 a bit more than two months into the toughen is going to completely destroy any chances of well doing anything that season. On a side say. Michael Young managed to pull his average up to.315 (the highest on the aggroup!) after going something desire.192 for the first month. There’s a reason he’s my favorite current Ranger. Anyway the sports calendar presses onward and now it’s football season. I really couldn’t care less. It is kind of cool that the best-known football team in the NFL is from here (the Cowboys) and it’s good for local morale that they’ve started the season 4-0 or something like that but I just don’t like football. I watched the back up half of the game against the Rams on Sunday for lack of anything better to do and I was just kind of bored. I also remembered one of the many reasons I don’t like football - ‘challenges’ and instant reproduce. For those not familiar with the feature: if the coach thinks a call went the do by way against his team he can impel out a contend sign and the referees are obliged to watch the play again on these little TVs they have on the sidelines. If the refs decide it was a bad call it gets reversed. If they decide it was called correctly they charge the team that wasted 3 minutes of everybody’s time a timeout (in football each team has something like 3 timeouts per half… I really don’t know exactly how it works). Each team can only make two challenges per game though if they both prove in a changed call they get a third challenge. You can’t make challenges in the last two minutes of a game. Now let’s anticipate that it makes sense that coaches should be able to challenge calls made on the handle. Do any of the restrictions put on them alter any sense? Well the “only 2 challenges unless both are alter and then you get at third” obviously makes no sense. If you accept that coaches should be able to protest bad calls why can they only protest a certain be per game? Perhaps they should be penalized for frivolous challenges but why should they be limited in the number of successful challenges be made? The same for the “last two minutes of a game” rule. The purpose of that command is to make the end of games go quicker. But it just makes no logical sense that you wouldn’t be able to challenge at that point if the call was bad. And what’s the deal with it using up a timeout if the call is frivolous? Football is a timed game (another reason I dislike it) so you have to penalize people for wasting time intentionally. But it just seems strange to me that you’d be penalized a time-out for frivolous challenges. I suppose this stems from my dislike of the entire system of “punishment” in football (and basketball and hockey and… well the only sport other than baseball that gets it right is soccer). Unsportsmanlike care? 15 yard penalty! False start? 5 yards! And what about basketball? Technical foul? A free throw for the other aggroup! Essentially you make actions that don’t undergo to do with the bet but rather with player conduct and punish them in ways that affect the result of the game itself. I much prefer the baseball method - if a player or coach does something so egregious as to merit punishment eject them from the game. Otherwise don’t do anything. But my fundamental problem with instant reproduce hasn’t even been mentioned yet. It is the basic assumption that coaches should be allowed to challenge the referees’ calls while the bet is still progressing. Baseball says essentially that for the purposes of the game the umpires are infallible. That’s not actually the case but it is necessary to hold the illusion otherwise all respect for the umpires is lost. It turns from a sporting event into a contest of who can beat convince the umpire to change his decision in request to favor their team. If an umpire makes a bad call too bad. After the bet is over the umpire can be corrected for his error but during the game the judge’s word is law. (There’s actually 4 umpires and the head umpire’s word is law - he can decree the word of the other umpires.) This ensures that the game progresses smoothly that there’s no stopping in mid-game to argue over the rules of the bet and that it’s a contest of athleticism and strategy rather than a contest of persuasion. The principle can actually be extended to games other than sporting events. It is essentially that you need to decide before the game who is in rush of the rules and have that person and only that person adjudicate disputes. Otherwise you pay a clump of time arguing over the nature of the rules and how to bear on them in this or that situation. That can be fun as come up but it’s a different kind of fun. And if you’re trying to play an established type of game (baseball soccer whatever) the former almost always works best. The latter is more for when making up a game among friends (as I and my brothers often do). <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <label> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q have in mind=""> <strike> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://turinhurinson.wordpress.com/2007/10/01/umpirical-infallibility/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Umpirical Infallibility" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-01-18 00:13:26

The baseball season is over. The Rangers’ record? 75-87. Disappointing but not surprising. I would say. Better than one would have expected earlier in the season at least. We were 23-42 on June 13. We actually had a winning preserve since that inform in the season. But going 19 games below.500 a bit more than two months into the season is going to completely destroy any chances of come up doing anything that season. On a side note. Michael Young managed to pull his add up up to.315 (the highest on the team!) after going something like.192 for the first month. There’s a cerebrate he’s my favorite current Ranger. Anyway the sports schedule presses onward and now it’s football season. I really couldn’t care less. It is kind of cool that the best-known football team in the NFL is from here (the Cowboys) and it’s good for local morale that they’ve started the toughen 4-0 or something like that but I just don’t like football. I watched the second half of the bet against the Rams on Sunday for lack of anything better to do and I was just kind of bored. I also remembered one of the many reasons I don’t like football - ‘challenges’ and instant replay. For those not familiar with the feature: if the instruct thinks a call went the wrong way against his team he can throw out a contend sign and the referees are obliged to watch the compete again on these little TVs they have on the sidelines. If the refs decide it was a bad call it gets reversed. If they decide it was called correctly they charge the team that wasted 3 minutes of everybody’s measure a timeout (in football each aggroup has something like 3 timeouts per half… I really don’t experience exactly how it works). Each team can only alter two challenges per bet though if they both prove in a changed call they get a third challenge. You can’t make challenges in the last two minutes of a game. Now let’s assume that it makes comprehend that coaches should be able to challenge calls made on the field. Do any of the restrictions put on them make any sense? Well the “only 2 challenges unless both are alter and then you get at third” obviously makes no comprehend. If you accept that coaches should be able to protest bad calls why can they only protest a certain be per bet? Perhaps they should be penalized for frivolous challenges but why should they be limited in the number of successful challenges be made? The same for the “measure two minutes of a game” rule. The purpose of that command is to alter the end of games go quicker. But it just makes no logical sense that you wouldn’t be able to challenge at that inform if the call was bad. And what’s the deal with it using up a timeout if the label is frivolous? Football is a timed bet (another reason I dislike it) so you undergo to penalize people for wasting time intentionally. But it just seems strange to me that you’d be penalized a time-out for frivolous challenges. I suppose this stems from my dislike of the entire system of “punishment” in football (and basketball and hockey and… well the only feature other than baseball that gets it right is soccer). Unsportsmanlike conduct? 15 yard penalty! False go away? 5 yards! And what about basketball? Technical foul? A remove throw for the other team! Essentially you make actions that don’t have to do with the game but rather with player conduct and punish them in ways that affect the result of the game itself. I much prefer the baseball method - if a player or instruct does something so egregious as to merit punishment expel them from the game. Otherwise don’t do anything. But my fundamental problem with instant replay hasn’t change surface been mentioned yet. It is the basic assumption that coaches should be allowed to challenge the referees’ calls while the game is still progressing. Baseball says essentially that for the purposes of the bet the umpires are infallible. That’s not actually the inspect but it is necessary to preserve the illusion otherwise all respect for the umpires is lost. It turns from a sporting event into a contest of who can best convince the umpire to dress his decision in request to advance their team. If an judge makes a bad call too bad. After the bet is over the umpire can be corrected for his error but during the game the judge’s word is law. (There’s actually 4 umpires and the continue umpire’s word is law - he can overrule the word of the other umpires.) This ensures that the game progresses smoothly that there’s no stopping in mid-game to lay out over the rules of the game and that it’s a contest of athleticism and strategy rather than a oppose of persuasion. The principle can actually be extended to games other than sporting events. It is essentially that you need to decide before the game who is in charge of the rules and undergo that person and only that person decide disputes. Otherwise you spend a bunch of time arguing over the nature of the rules and how to apply them in this or that situation. That can be fun as well but it’s a different kind of fun. And if you’re trying to play an established write of game (baseball soccer whatever) the former almost always works best. The latter is more for when making up a game among friends (as I and my brothers often do). <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <touch> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://turinhurinson.wordpress.com/2007/10/01/umpirical-infallibility/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Umpirical Infallibility" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-01-18 00:13:25

The baseball toughen is over. The Rangers’ record? 75-87. Disappointing but not surprising. I would say. Better than one would have expected earlier in the toughen at least. We were 23-42 on June 13. We actually had a winning record since that point in the season. But going 19 games below.500 a bit more than two months into the season is going to completely destroy any chances of well doing anything that season. On a side note. Michael Young managed to pull his add up up to.315 (the highest on the aggroup!) after going something desire.192 for the first month. There’s a reason he’s my favorite current Ranger. Anyway the sports schedule presses onward and now it’s football toughen. I really couldn’t care less. It is kind of cool that the best-known football team in the NFL is from here (the Cowboys) and it’s good for local morale that they’ve started the toughen 4-0 or something like that but I just don’t like football. I watched the second half of the bet against the Rams on Sunday for lack of anything exceed to do and I was just kind of bored. I also remembered one of the many reasons I don’t like football - ‘challenges’ and instant reproduce. For those not familiar with the sport: if the coach thinks a call went the do by way against his aggroup he can impel out a contend flag and the referees are obliged to check the play again on these little TVs they have on the sidelines. If the refs decide it was a bad call it gets reversed. If they decide it was called correctly they charge the team that wasted 3 minutes of everybody’s time a timeout (in football each team has something desire 3 timeouts per half… I really don’t know exactly how it works). Each team can only alter two challenges per game though if they both result in a changed label they get a third challenge. You can’t make challenges in the measure two minutes of a bet. Now let’s anticipate that it makes sense that coaches should be able to challenge calls made on the field. Do any of the restrictions put on them alter any sense? come up the “only 2 challenges unless both are alter and then you get at third” obviously makes no sense. If you accept that coaches should be able to complain bad calls why can they only protest a certain be per bet? Perhaps they should be penalized for frivolous challenges but why should they be limited in the number of successful challenges be made? The same for the “last two minutes of a game” command. The purpose of that rule is to make the end of games go quicker. But it just makes no logical sense that you wouldn’t be able to challenge at that inform if the label was bad. And what’s the deal with it using up a timeout if the call is frivolous? Football is a timed game (another reason I dislike it) so you undergo to penalize people for wasting time intentionally. But it just seems strange to me that you’d be penalized a time-out for frivolous challenges. I suppose this stems from my dislike of the entire system of “punishment” in football (and basketball and hockey and… well the only feature other than baseball that gets it alter is soccer). Unsportsmanlike conduct? 15 yard penalty! False start? 5 yards! And what about basketball? Technical foul? A free impel for the other aggroup! Essentially you alter actions that don’t have to do with the game but rather with player conduct and punish them in ways that affect the result of the game itself. I much prefer the baseball method - if a player or instruct does something so egregious as to be punishment eject them from the bet. Otherwise don’t do anything. But my fundamental problem with instant replay hasn’t change surface been mentioned yet. It is the basic assumption that coaches should be allowed to challenge the referees’ calls while the game is comfort progressing. Baseball says essentially that for the purposes of the game the umpires are infallible. That’s not actually the case but it is necessary to hold the illusion otherwise all respect for the umpires is lost. It turns from a sporting event into a contest of who can best convince the umpire to dress his decision in order to advance their team. If an umpire makes a bad call too bad. After the bet is over the umpire can be corrected for his error but during the game the umpire’s word is law. (There’s actually 4 umpires and the head judge’s word is law - he can overrule the word of the other umpires.) This ensures that the game progresses smoothly that there’s no stopping in mid-game to argue over the rules of the game and that it’s a contest of athleticism and strategy rather than a oppose of persuasion. The principle can actually be extended to games other than sporting events. It is essentially that you need to decide before the game who is in charge of the rules and have that person and only that person decide disputes. Otherwise you spend a clump of time arguing over the nature of the rules and how to bear on them in this or that situation. That can be fun as come up but it’s a different kind of fun. And if you’re trying to play an established write of bet (baseball soccer whatever) the former almost always works best. The latter is more for when making up a bet among friends (as I and my brothers often do). <a href="" call=""> <abbr call=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://turinhurinson.wordpress.com/2007/10/01/umpirical-infallibility/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Umpirical Infallibility" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-01-18 00:13:25

The baseball season is over. The Rangers’ record? 75-87. Disappointing but not surprising. I would say. Better than one would have expected earlier in the season at least. We were 23-42 on June 13. We actually had a winning record since that point in the toughen. But going 19 games below.500 a bit more than two months into the season is going to completely destroy any chances of well doing anything that season. On a side note. Michael Young managed to displace his add up up to.315 (the highest on the aggroup!) after going something like.192 for the first month. There’s a reason he’s my favorite current Ranger. Anyway the sports calendar presses onward and now it’s football season. I really couldn’t compassionate less. It is kind of cool that the best-known football team in the NFL is from here (the Cowboys) and it’s good for local morale that they’ve started the season 4-0 or something like that but I just don’t like football. I watched the second half of the game against the Rams on Sunday for lack of anything better to do and I was just kind of bored. I also remembered one of the many reasons I don’t like football - ‘challenges’ and instant reproduce. For those not familiar with the feature: if the instruct thinks a call went the do by way against his team he can impel out a challenge flag and the referees are obliged to watch the play again on these little TVs they have on the sidelines. If the refs end it was a bad call it gets reversed. If they decide it was called correctly they rush the team that wasted 3 minutes of everybody’s time a timeout (in football each team has something desire 3 timeouts per half… I really don’t know exactly how it works). Each team can only make two challenges per game though if they both result in a changed call they get a third challenge. You can’t make challenges in the last two minutes of a bet. Now let’s anticipate that it makes sense that coaches should be able to contend calls made on the handle. Do any of the restrictions put on them make any sense? Well the “only 2 challenges unless both are alter and then you get at third” obviously makes no sense. If you evaluate that coaches should be able to protest bad calls why can they only complain a certain be per game? Perhaps they should be penalized for frivolous challenges but why should they be limited in the be of successful challenges be made? The same for the “last two minutes of a bet” rule. The purpose of that command is to alter the end of games go quicker. But it just makes no logical sense that you wouldn’t be able to challenge at that point if the call was bad. And what’s the deal with it using up a timeout if the label is frivolous? Football is a timed game (another reason I dislike it) so you have to penalize people for wasting time intentionally. But it just seems strange to me that you’d be penalized a time-out for frivolous challenges. I suppose this stems from my dislike of the entire system of “punishment” in football (and basketball and hockey and… come up the only feature other than baseball that gets it right is soccer). Unsportsmanlike conduct? 15 yard penalty! False start? 5 yards! And what about basketball? Technical foul? A free throw for the other aggroup! Essentially you make actions that don’t have to do with the game but rather with player conduct and punish them in ways that affect the prove of the game itself. I much prefer the baseball method - if a player or coach does something so egregious as to merit punishment expel them from the bet. Otherwise don’t do anything. But my fundamental problem with instant replay hasn’t even been mentioned yet. It is the basic assumption that coaches should be allowed to challenge the referees’ calls while the game is still progressing. Baseball says essentially that for the purposes of the game the umpires are infallible. That’s not actually the case but it is necessary to preserve the illusion otherwise all respect for the umpires is lost. It turns from a sporting event into a contest of who can best convince the umpire to change his decision in order to favor their aggroup. If an umpire makes a bad call too bad. After the bet is over the judge can be corrected for his error but during the game the umpire’s evince is law. (There’s actually 4 umpires and the continue judge’s word is law - he can overrule the evince of the other umpires.) This ensures that the game progresses smoothly that there’s no stopping in mid-game to lay out over the rules of the game and that it’s a contest of athleticism and strategy rather than a contest of persuasion. The principle can actually be extended to games other than sporting events. It is essentially that you need to decide before the bet who is in charge of the rules and undergo that person and only that person adjudicate disputes. Otherwise you spend a bunch of time arguing over the nature of the rules and how to bear on them in this or that situation. That can be fun as well but it’s a different kind of fun. And if you’re trying to play an established type of game (baseball soccer whatever) the former almost always works beat. The latter is more for when making up a game among friends (as I and my brothers often do). <a href="" call=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym call=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <have in mind> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://turinhurinson.wordpress.com/2007/10/01/umpirical-infallibility/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Introduction to moi, and my school day" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-12-20 21:45:59

School bell woke me up as usual! We get two bells one to wake us up and another to express us to get the hell out of our rooms because breakfast's ready! Got dressed into my uniform which is color: blue skirt blue checked blouse blue jumper. Brushed my hair and put it up. Ran downstairs as the back up bell was ringing. Georgiana behind me shoving me dangerously and Amelie in front nearly tripping up in her haste to get downstairs. In the dining hall we joined the queue to get food. I had Weetabix and a cup of milk - yum. Sat with Jaz. Georgie. Amelie. Jess and Lucy. We always undergo to tidy our rooms ready for inspection at 8.30am. Our housemistress comes round to check the dorms are order and if they're not she makes us tidy them at night instead of watching EastEnders or Corrie or some other soap. The housemistresses are nice really unless you cross them and then they switch to 'Psycho' mode and undergo a big spaz attacks lol. Georgie had a huge panic because she thought she'd lost Henry Horse her special teddy feature but he was under the quilt she'd hurriedly piled on her bed. We all have special teddies mine is Bob! We have two lessons before lunch. Each of our lessons lasts for forty-five mins and our breaks (we undergo two) last for a half-hour. Our lunch is an hour and then we undergo another lesson then a break and then another lesson. The day girls can either bring their own lunch or eat with us boarders and most of them decide the gorgeous school meals. Seriously they are gorgeous!! You've never tasted better school food. I had beanie pizza which sounds disgusting but is sooooo lovely and chips with water and a banana. The day girls go home now unless they're using the huuuuggggeeee library or doing after school activities. Today. I dump my bag in my room and go to the sports block to change into my PE kit: blue shorts and tee-shirt and white trainers. I'm joining the hockey club. I know I'll alter the team because for the past four years of being at H. I have done. I'm ace at hockey. I love it! I also play tennis and I'm on the schools swimming and equestrian teams. My gorgeous chestnut horse is a show-jumper and its my first year with a horse at H so I'm dead pleased. Usually I borrow one of the schools horses. Luckily. Red short for Red Sky At Night is on beat livery so I don't have to do much because the educate provides care for him (ie: the grooms feed muck out and apply him unless I can do it). I cater up with Holly in the changing rooms she's my hockey buddy..

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://my-public-school-life.blogspot.com/2007/09/hello-and-welcome-to-my-blog.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


 

 




blogs - aa blogs - air force blogs - aquarius blogs - aries blogs - army blogs - arts blogs - baby blogs - blogs 4 men - blogs 4 women - cancer blogs - capricorn blogs - career change blogs - choice blogs - christmas blogs - cigar blogs - cigarette blogs - cig blogs - coast guard blogs - coffee bean blogs - college baseball blogs - college basketball blogs - college football blogs - colleges blogs - computer blogs - create blogs - dating blogs - elvis blogs - email chat blogs - email pal blogs - enhancement blogs - fall blogs - fha blogs - freedom blogs - friendly blogs - funny blogs - gambler blogs - gemini blogs - her blog - his blog - hockey blogs - join blogs - javas blogs - kid safe blogs - leo blogs - libra blogs - apartments blogs - coffees blogs - horoscopes blogs - life advice blogs - lover blogs - marine blogs - married blogs - military blogs - misc blogs - more money blogs - mortgage blogs - move blogs - movies blogs - musical blogs - navy blogs - new in town blogs - obscure blogs - online date blogs - online game blogs - over 30 blogs - over 40 blogs - over 50 blogs - over 60 blogs - over 70 blogs - over 80 blogs - over 90 blogs - password blogs - pc blogs - mortgages blogs - peoples blogs - pictures blogs - pipe blogs - pisces blogs - poems blogs - poker blogs - police blogs - political blogs radio blogs - read blogs - recreational vehicle blogs - relocation blogs - reserve blogs - rv blogs - safe blogs - scorpio blogs - singles blogs - smokers blogs - smoker blogs - state blogs - state college blogs - taurus blogs - teen advice blogs - teenager blogs - tobacco blogs - tv blogs - vacation blogs - veteran blogs - virgo blogs - virtual blogs - weekly blogs - wingman blogs - word blogs - words blogs - writer blogs - poetry blogs - prescription blogs - sagittarius blogs - straight blogs - summer blogs - gi blogs - hooka blogs - penis enlargement blogs - vfw blogs - casinos blogs - casino blogs - web hosting blogs - hosting blogs - auto blogs - truck blogs - van blogs - suv blogs - 4 wheel blogs - harley blogs - flu blogs - diet blogs - pistols blogs - teenage blogs - lpga blogs - burnable blogs - new tunes blogs - coaching blogs - treasures blogs - trades blogs - nutty blogs - skate blogs - play 21 blogs - weather blogs - poker players - golf blogs - american blogs - football blogs - baseball blogs - hockey blogs - basketball blogs - soccer blogs - cooking blogs - recipe blogs - space blogs - 3d games blogs - barbecue blogs




the basic hockey rules archives:

11 articles in 2006-01
22 articles in 2006-02
27 articles in 2006-03
36 articles in 2006-04
27 articles in 2006-05
26 articles in 2006-06
24 articles in 2006-07
18 articles in 2006-08
22 articles in 2006-09
30 articles in 2006-10
22 articles in 2006-11
22 articles in 2006-12
12 articles in 2007-01
12 articles in 2007-02
3 articles in 2007-03
7 articles in 2007-04
11 articles in 2007-05
10 articles in 2007-06
3 articles in 2007-07
1 articles in 2007-09




next page


basic hockey rules